How many classrooms have computers

Moving forward, the idea, he said, was to start investing in laptops for high school students. But then coronavirus upended those plans, and the 50, new devices will bring the district to a complete 1-to-1 computing ratio much quicker. Up until now, the district had used its laptops to mostly supplement core instruction for reading and math only. The devices were tied to carts. Back about 20 years ago, when Wilson, the co-founder of the nonprofit One-to-One Institute, started evangelizing for the idea of putting a laptop in the hands of every student, she said superintendents and district officials were loath to spend money on technology for the classroom.

But as districts warmed to technology, Wilson said they started buying laptops with no idea how to effectively use them. That approach, for instance, was taken in the Los Angeles schools several years ago and resulted in a colossal failure and a huge waste of money and time. To avoid that kind of mess, districts need to plan ahead before moving to 1-to-1, she said—everything from network infrastructure to device selection to finances for maintenance and upgrades to teacher training.

On the flipside of a 1-to-1 computing district, there are school districts still without enough devices for students to do tech-driven, remote learning. Coming up with the cash to pay for new devices has been one of the biggest challenges. So the district took to raising money online. Aleesia Johnson, superintendent of the Indianapolis school district, said her district is planning to use federal stimulus money mostly to pay for 21, new devices and up to 9, WiFi hotspots that will bring the district up to a 1-to-1 computing ratio.

Johnson said IPS also resorted to online fundraising to help cover some device and hotspot costs. All Topics. About Us. Group Subscriptions. Recruitment Advertising.

Events and Webinars. Leaders to Learn From. Current Issue. Special Reports. Partly in response to complaints, the district decided to use fewer computers in the early elementary grades, adopting a one-to-five ratio instead. Lower-income parents may be having doubts too: Rocketship had to drop plans to open a third school in Washington, DC, after only 22 students signed up.

Much attention has been focused on the so-called digital divide—the relative lack of access that lower-income Americans have to technology and the internet. Fed up with apps, people looking for romance are finding inspiration on Twitter, TikTok—and even email newsletters. From Jibo to Aibo, humans have a long track record of falling for their robots. Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more. Thank you for submitting your email!

It looks like something went wrong. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service technologyreview.

Skip to Content. Emily Haasch. Deep Dive. Humans and technology. Three new books lay bare the weirdness of how our brains process the world around us. By Matthew Hutson archive page. By Tanya Basu archive page. To build the metaverse, Facebook needs us to get used to smart glasses. Applin archive page. Stay connected Illustration by Rose Wong. Enter your email. A higher percentage of students in suburban areas had fixed broadband access at home than students in rural areas, with the largest difference noted for students in remote rural areas.

For example, in remote rural areas the percentages of students who had either no internet access or only dial-up access at home were higher for Black 41 percent and Hispanic students 26 percent than for White 13 percent and Asian students 11 percent. Also, a lower percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch reported that they had a digital device in their home, or that they first used a computer prior to first grade, than their peers who were not eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.

Other Resources: Listed by Release Date. C Craig A. Realizing a vision of computers as productivity-enhancing mindtools is more difficult still. It requires transforming classrooms into information-rich workrooms, in which students use the Internet as a huge repository of real-world data, images, text, and other resources.

They gather resources that are relevant to real problems, manipulate these resources to find patterns of similarity and difference, and compare their hypotheses or tentative findings with those of other students around the world. This dream is not impossible. For the past 10 years, the Union City, New Jersey, school district has been retraining teachers and building a full K curriculum based on the use of technology.

Replicating that success widely would be difficult indeed. While many teachers have the necessary intelligence and disposition to succeed in a wired classroom, the teaching profession as a whole is rife with people who prefer delivering prepackaged curricula, using traditional tools, and assessing student progress in traditional ways.

Over the next decade more than 2 million new teachers will be hired. If these new teachers are more technologically oriented or more enthusiastic about new modes of teaching and learning, perhaps computers can begin to realize their educational potential. But according to a Education Week study, teachers in their first five years of service are no more likely to integrate technology into their teaching than are year veterans.

Perhaps certain barriers to technology integration are inherent in the nature of teaching and learning; if so, the barriers are not well understood.